There is great confusion in the Baba world as to what exactly Meher Baba meant by his various statements on politics, and the need to not mix up love for him with politics.
Meher Baba had a dim view of politics in general, but especially relative to his spiritual work which completely eschewed politics. Real spirituality, he claimed, has nothing to do with politics. God, and the love for God, should never be confused or conflated with politics. God, who is infinite and indivisible, must not be politicized.
But the matter is not so simple, it turns out.
Does this mean that a Baba lover should not enter politics, as often illustrated by Baba’s statement to Mahatma Gandhi that he should leave politics and come to reside with Baba? On the other hand, Sarosh Irani, an intimate disciple, was mayor of Ahmednagar at Baba’s direction. And there are other similar examples. So what is the point?
The point, I believe, is that the indivisible truth and purity of God and love for God can never be represented politically.
Now, Baba also made interesting observations on partisan politics as inherently problematic, practically speaking: group-think demanded by party loyalty will always compromise individual honor and integrity, and thus prove to be worthless. Politics will inevitably betray one’s highest values, in any case.
Then there is the injunction to not talk about politics at the Meher Spiritual Center in Myrtle Beach, SC. This has generated an attitude among many that to talk about politics at all, anywhere, is a waste of time better spent remembering God; that to talk about politics is somehow dirty and unspiritual.
This gives rise to the problem that much of life is political one way or another, and so how does one talk about power? How does one talk about the abuse of power- without being accused of being political?
The current example of genocidal Israel is an excellent example of how a grave humanitarian problem gets wholly subsumed as “political”, and thus rendered a taboo subject. This of course becomes a highly repressive power trip on the part of Baba lover Zionists.
Thus the problem facing a Baba lover concerned about injustice, is how to address the subject of power and injustice without being accused of being political. For many, the default attitude is simply to not discuss controversial topics. This is completely lame, needless to say.
It should be said that for many truth and justice are closely related, and cannot be so easily divorced. In fact, in Islam, social justice is considered a direct reflection of religious faith. It is not possible to be a good Muslim, and be indifferent to social injustice. Remember that the Prophet was both a political and spiritual leader on the basis of divine revelation, and that this is the primary difference between him and Christ. The Christian can more easily maintain that God is pie in the sky.
The problem in a nutshell for the Baba lover is how to address the egregious abuse of power illustrated by the US imperial war machine, especially in the case of support for the self-identified Jewish state of Israel, without being accused of talking politics.
Now, what if a Baba lover reads Meher Baba’s own words on war, and what represents just and unjust war, and concludes that to vocally oppose murderous fascism as illustrated by US support of Israeli policy is fully justified by such words? That there could hardly be a more open and shut example of what Baba meant by catastrophically unjust war and violence.
We are in a pickle, except for those who have the courage to cut the cant and grok that truth and justice can never be separated by rhetorical sleight of hand. If we desire a New Humanity, we must act like we really want a New Humanity, and in the name of that God who will deliver us to such a world.
