Darvish Khan Writes

About the “two party presidential nominee debate” on 10/19/2016:

Fitting that the debate should start with the second amendment- Americans do love their guns! Suggesting that guns should be regulated is like suggesting to men that their pricks be monitored: why should that be the government’s business? Well, I guess as long as guns are an extension of faux masculinity, i.e. rage and impotence, they will be regarded as problematic.

Maybe this also explains why the debate assumed that the Terror Wars could be euphemistically referred to as “hot spots”. The US is having problems with “hot spots”- like practically the entire Middle East. The US has shot missiles at 7 Middle Eastern countries since 911 in an effort to deal with “hot spots”. “Hot spots” must be like the G spot. And these drone missiles are like a masked serial rapist who goes about his fun without ever revealing himself- or getting caught.

Print Friendly

The Democrats have moved into the vacuum left by the atomized Republicans. Hillary is the new socially liberal but otherwise conservative standard bearer. She is fully identified with the corporate and military classes. In true Clinton form, she has managed to bridge disparate political worlds as the only viable alternative to the clear and present danger of neofascism.

The commanding meme is that you would have to be out of your mind to not vote for her: her candidacy is that compelling. There is no other choice. In fact, if you dare consider that there is any other choice, well, clearly, you are out of your mind. And deserving of censure and the medical ward.

Print Friendly